“I believe that banking institutions
are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people, ever allow private banks to control the
issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks]
will deprive the people of all property, until their children wake-up homeless, on the continent their fathers conquered.
The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” ~
Thomas Jefferson ~ 3rd President of The United States (1743-1826)
The Bankers or US!”
Alex Jones (InfoWars.Com) explains how the “austerity” hammer, (now falling on Europe) will soon come crashing-down upon
the USA. Fresh bailouts for, and buyouts by, foreign banks, are being forced upon the citizens of the U.S., Ireland and other
European nations, while 'officials' here in the United States, are mandating, (by decree) that social security,
pensions, 401-Ks, insurance for veterans and active military personnel, (and more) are being taken away. EVERYTHING GOES TO THE BANKSTERS, IN THIS PLANNED ECONOMIC COLLAPSE OF AMERICA.
The IMF and World Bank have essentially completed 'phase 1' of their mission, of absorbing and dominating “3rd World”
nations, and are now coming after the so-called “1st World” Nations -- the United States, Canada, UK, Europe and
on. It appears as though the plans to enslave Americans, (as stated by Col. Edward Mandell House) has, (at last) come
to fruition ...
HOW YOUR MONEY, REALLY
And NOW ...
The statement, (as quoted below, to President Woodrow Wilson) was made by Edward Mandell House, of Austin, Texas, (1858-1938) who made secret missions to Europe
and helped Wilson get elected: Shortly thereafter in 1913, the 'Federal Reserve' was initiated. The Council on Foreign Relations was founded in 1921 by Edward Mandell House, who had been the chief advisor to President Wilson. House, was also a close
confidant of Banksters J.P.Morgan and Rothchild ... A Pack of Vampiric, CriminalRats,
“Very soon, every American will be required to register their
biological property in a national system, designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system
of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge
back for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living.
They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under
the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be
rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be
stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not
one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal
plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants
in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits and beyond our wildest expectations and
leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it,
every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant,
however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high
office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”
* TREASON: –noun 1. The offense of acting to overthrow
one’s government or to harm or kill its sovereignty. 2. A violation of allegiance to one’s sovereign or to
one’s state. 3. The betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.
~ TREASON; A NOTICE TO 'PUBLIC SERVANTS' ~ The Following NOTICE, Should Be Sent To ALL Public Servants, Who Work For Federal,
State, and Local Government.
On the night of December 23, 1913 the United States Congress passed
The “Federal Reserve Act” and thereby committed the greatest act of TREASON in history. It surrendered this nation's sovereignty and sold the American
people into slavery, to a cabal of arch-charlatan international bankers who proceeded
to plunder, bankrupt, and conquer this nation with the greatest money swindle in modern history.
The “money” the banks issue are merely book-keeping entries. It cost them nothing and is not backed by their
wealth, efforts, property, or risk. It is not redeemable except in more debt paper. The Federal Reserve Act, forced us to
pay compound interest on thin air. We now use worthless “notes” backed by
our own credit that we cannot own and are made subject to compelled performance for the “privilege.”
From 1913 until 1933, the United States paid the “interest” with more and more gold. The structured inevitability
soon transpired: the Treasury was empty, the debt was greater than ever, and the United States declared bankruptcy. In exchange
for using notes belonging to bankers who create them out of nothing on our own credit, we are forced to repay in substance
(labor, property, land, businesses, resources, life in ever-increasing amounts. This may have been the greatest heist and
fraud of all time.
When a government goes bankrupt, it loses its sovereignty. In 1933 the United States declared bankruptcy, as expressed in Roosevelt’s Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260, House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933, confirmed in Perry v. United States, (1935) 294
U.S. 330-381, 79 L.Ed 912, as well as 31 USC 5112, 5119, and 12 USC 95A. The bankrupt United States went into receivership,
reorganized in favor of 115 creditors and new owners. In 1913, Congress turned over America ... lock, stock and barrel, to
a handful of criminals whose avowed intent from the beginning, was to plunder, bankrupt, conquer, and enslave the people of
the United States of America and eliminate this nation from the face of the earth. The goal was, and is, to absorb America
into a one-world private commercial government, a “New World Order.”
On March 9, 1933 President Roosevelt called for the passing of The WAR POWERS ACT TITLE 12 USC. Section 95 (a) and 95 (b). This 'Act' Declared ALL
United States Citizens To Be The 'Enemy of the United States Government,' and placed us under permanent Emergency Rule,
by-passing Constitutional constraints upon government.
With the Erie R.R. v Tompkins case of 1938, the Supreme Court confirmed their success. We are now
in an international private commercial jurisdiction in colorable admiralty-maritime under the Law Merchant. We have been conned and betrayed out of
our sovereignty, rights, property, freedom, common law, Article III Courts, and The Bill of Rights has been statutized into
“civil rights” in commerce. You have destroyed the Republic. America has been stolen. We have been made slaves,
i.e. permanent debtors, bankrupt, in legal incapacity, rendered commercial “persons,” “residents,”
and corporate franchisees known as “citizens of the United States”
An insidious aspect of this
is that “officials” like you may think you are “public servants,” are upholding the “law,”
or other hoaxes. In truth, you are conscientiously and assiduously serving the archenemies of yourselves, your own rights,
your fellow citizens, continued human rights, life, liberty and freedom in general. YOU are seditiously administering the
plunder, bankruptcy, conquest, destruction, dismantling, and elimination of your own country. YOU are systematically defrauding,
extorting, impoverishing, and injuring human life, on the basis of crimes and lies of such magnitude, depth, and proportions
as to be beyond human comprehension.
Now you believe you can sell this nation to foreign powers, with the mere
stroke of a pen, by Executive Order 12803, April 30, 1992. By so doing, you are committing TREASON and PERFIDY so immense as “to make the angels weep.” If you and
your fellow “officials” do not understand the real situation, you are ignorant, naive, deceived, and conned. You
are sheer dupes. If you do know and are parties to it, you are guilty of evil and heinous BETRAYAL. You are in such case TRAITORS
and CRIMINALS. All of you “in power” are therefore, either fools or knaves, either of which eminently invalidates
your “authority” and renders null and void absolutely all-moral obligation to pay allegiance or to obey the TREASONOUS
SYSTEM you enforce with such mechanical viciousness.
If, you, “public servants” had any shred
left of humanity, awe, heart, clarity, sanity, access to your true being and conscience, you would instantly resign and do
everything possible to inform the American people of their plight and help us retrieve our rights and our country. Only by
such means can you even begin to atone for your endless crimes against humanity, the lives you so arrogantly and mindlessly
butcher with the “meat-grinder of the law.”
What do you think the American people will do as
they discover that they have no more country, that they are slaves to mortal enemies, that they have been tricked and betrayed
by their “leaders” who sold them out? What do you think they will do when they realize that all their alleged
“public servants” are willing or stupidly compliant parties to the plunder, bankruptcy, subjugation, and ruin
of their lives and country?
There's no acceptable excuse for what you've done. You cannot engage in bringing
harm to life and, like the Nazi’s defense at Nuremberg, presume that because you do so under the “authority”
of an imaginary, abstract, unreal legal fiction called “government” you are freed of the consequences of your
acts. Moral and natural law are not obviated by ignorance, hubris and self-righteous militancy. Your entire system –
from the ground up – is deceit and fraud. It is illicit in essence and ab initio. As Herbert Broom's Maxims 297, 729
put it: “A right of action cannot arise out of fraud.” Honor is earned by honesty and integrity, not under false
and fraudulent pretenses. The color of the cloth one wears cannot cover up the usurpations, lies, and treachery. “When
black is fraudulently declared to be white, not all will live in darkness.”
More and More Americans ARE
Awakening To The TRUTH: What do you think the American
people will do, as they discover that they have no more country, that they are slaves to mortal enemies, that they have been
tricked and betrayed by their “leaders” who sold them out? What do you think they will do, when they realize that
all their alleged “public servants” are willing, or stupidly compliant parties to the plunder, bankruptcy, subjugation,
ruin and destruction of their lives and country? Thomas Jefferson wrote: “An honest man can feel no pleasure in the
exercise of power over his fellow citizens.” Lincoln said: “Just as I would not be a slave, neither would I be
I will not participate in your corrupt, arrogant, and cruel fraud, either as perpetrator
or victim. I will no longer sit here and writhe. THE TYRANNY OVER THIS NATION MUST END! End Emergency Rule. Repeal all laws
passed under Emergency Rule. Give us back our substance and our law. Give us back our Republic with our democratic form of
government, based upon Jeffersonian principles.
If you continue on this course, you
will have natural and moral law and higher powers to answer to, not to mention all those you have wronged under color of law.
You will have your own laws turned against you, as you have turned the law against us. To transform the shield of protection
into a sword of exploitation, subjugation, and plunder is perfidy. I am an American. My destiny, is to live as a free man,
on the land my forefathers conquered and that I will fight to keep.
The 'Public Servants' Have Now Been Placed ON NOTICE ... All
Further Actions On Your Part, Will Be Considered As 'Willful.'
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason
from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known, and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor
moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government
itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor, he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face
and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation,
he works secretly and unknown in the night, to undermine the pillars of a city, he infects the body politic, so that it can
no longer resist ... A murderer is less to be feared.” -- Cicero, 42 B.C.
Ron Paul's Farewell Speech To Congress(Nov. 14, 2012)
Ron Paul issued his last speech as a member
of Congress and, (in my humble opinion) was
one of the most important speeches, we as citizens of this falling Republic will ever hear, in American history. ... He lays
out the raw truth of what's wrong with America and, why we're headed into an era of total bankruptcy and complete tyranny.
Everyone asks; “What happened to the honest politicians with integrity, that abide by our Constitution and Bill
of Rights?” Well, ... You could have had one as your president. -- Now
look what you've got.(Read The Full Transcript HERE)
Planned To Take Over The Planet, Via Economic Means, While Enslaving,
All of Mankind. (Yes
My Friends, ... They AREThatEvil ...)
Max Keiser ‘Does Westminster’
Max Keiser is a world renowned economic commentator & presenter whilst George Galloway a highly respected member of British parliament; Jeff Angel is a British film maker currently based in London. Jeff
has a long standing interest in both the financial markets and the geo- political landscape but his driving passion has, and
always will be, film making. ... The information disseminated, is both vital and timely.
‘Press For Truth’ Presents:“The Turning Point”
been selected, to attend the 60th Bilderberg conference in Chantilly, Virginia from May 31 - June 3, 2012. This conference
brings together leaders of business, economics, media, finance, politics and military in a forum which will allow for open
and off the record discussions of current events and global issues. I must stress, that this meeting is SECRET and, by invitation
only. We operate under ‘Chatham House’ Rules, meaning you are not permitted to discuss anything that is said during
the conference, to members of the media or anyone else. Please keep all of your arrangements confidential, including all of
the information included herein. In recent years, we have lost much of our control over the dissemination of information,
due to the rise of independent media sources and internet-based journalists. We intend to correct this problem and plan to
discuss it at this year's conference.
Edward Griffin Interviews 83 year-old Norman Dodd, Who Addmitted The Plan, (by Banker-backed Mega-corporations)
To Guide The United States Into a “New World Order.”
(Below, Is The Video of The 1982 “Reality Zone” Interview -- The Transcript Beneath.)
NORMAN DODD: Rowan Gaither was at that time president of the Ford Foundation. Mr. Gaither had sent for me when
I found it convenient to be in New York, asked me to call upon him at his office, which I did, and on arrival after a few
amenities, Mr. Gaither said: “Mr. Dodd, we've asked you to come up here today
because we thought that possibly, off the record, you would tell us why the Congress is interested in the activities of the
foundations such as ourselves.” Before I could think of how I would reply to that statement, Mr. Gaither then went on
and said: “Mr.
Dodd, all of us who have a hand in the making of policies here, have had experience operating under directives, the substance
of which, is that we shall use our grant-making power, so to alter life in the United States, that it can be comfortably merged
with the Soviet Union.”
Warning: You are about to enter The Reality Zone, a place where
truth is stranger than fiction, where knowledge is king, where myths are shattered, and deceptions exposed. It's a place where
the lessons of history are found and where true-life adventures reveal the hidden nature of man. If you proceed, you will
not be able to return to the twilight zone from which you came. You have five seconds remaining, to escape 5,... 4,... 3,...
2,... 1,... Escape.
ED GRIFFIN: Mr. Dodd, let's begin this interview with a brief statement. For the record, please tell
us who you are, what is your background and your qualifications to speak on this subject.
NORMAN DODD: Well, Mr. Griffin, as to who I am, I am just, as
the name implies, an individual born in New Jersey and educated in private schools, eventually in a school called Andover
in Massachusetts and then Yale university. Running through my whole period of being brought up and growing up, I have been
an indefatigable reader. I have had one major interest, and that was this country as I was lead to believe it was originally
founded. I entered the world of business knowing absolutely nothing about how that world operated, and realized that the only
way to find out what that world consisted of would be to become part of it. I then acquired some experience in the manufacturing
world and then in the world of international communication and finally chose banking as the field I wished to devote my life
to. I was fortunate enough to secure a position in one of the important banks in New York and lived there. I lived through
the conditions which led up to what is known as the crash of 1929. I witnessed what was tantamount to the collapse of the
structure of the United States as a whole. Much to my surprise, I was confronted by my superiors in
the middle of the panic in which they were immersed. I was confronted with the question: “Norm, what do we do now?”
I was thirty at the time and I had no more right to have an answer to that question than the man in the moon. However, I did
manage to say to my superiors: “Gentlemen, you take this experience as proof that there's something you do not know
about banking, and you'd better go find out what that something is and act accordingly.” Four days later I was confronted
by the same superiors with a statement to the effect that, “Norm, you go find out.” And I really was fool enough
to accept that assignment, because it meant that you were going out to search for something, and nobody could tell you what
you were looking for, but I felt so strongly on the subject that I consented. I was relieved of all
normal duties inside the bank and two-and-half years later I felt that it was possible to report back to those who had given
me this assignment. And so, I rendered such a report; and, as a result of the report I rendered. I was told the following:
“Norm, what you're saying is we should return to sound banking,” and I said, “Yes, in essence, that's exactly
what I’m saying.” Whereupon I got my first shock, which was a statement from them to this effect: “We will
never see sound banking in the United States again.” They cited chapter and verse to support that statement, and what
they cited was as follows: “Since the end of world war one we have been responsible for what they call the institutionalizing
of conflicting interests, and they are so prevalent inside this country that they can never be resolved.”
This came to me as an extraordinary shock because the men who made this statement were men who were deemed as the most prominent
bankers in the country. The bank of which I was a part, which I’ve spoken of, was a Morgan bank and, coming from men
of that caliber, a statement of that kind made a tremendous impression on me. The type of impression that it made on me was
such that I wondered if I, as an individual and what they call a junior officer of the bank, could with the same enthusiasm
foster the progress and policies of the bank. I spent about a year trying to think this out and came to the conclusion that
I would have to resign. I did resign; and, as a consequence of that, had this experience. When my
letter of resignation reached the desk of the president of the bank, he sent for me, and I came to visit with him, and he
stated to me: “Norm, I have your letter, but I don't believe you understand what's happened in the last 10 days.”
And I said, “No, Mr. Cochran, I have no idea what's happened.” “Well,” he said, “the directors
have never been able to get your report to them out of their mind; and, as a result, they have decided that you as an individual
must begin at once and you must reorganize this bank in keeping with your own ideas.” He then said, “Now, can
I tear up your letter?” Inasmuch as what had been said to me was offering me, at the age of by then 33, about as fine
an opportunity for service to the country as I could imagine, I said yes. They said they wished me to begin at once, and I
did. Suddenly, in the span of about six weeks, I was not permitted to do another piece of work and,
every time I brought the subject up, I was kind of patted on the back and told, “Stop worrying about it, Norm. Pretty
soon you'll be a vice president, and you'll have quite a handsome salary and ultimately be able to retire on a very worthwhile
pension. In the meantime you can play golf and tennis to your heart's content on weekends.” Well, Mr. Griffin, I found
I couldn't do it. I spent a year figuratively with my feet on the desk doing nothing and I couldn't adjust to it so I did
resign and, this time, my resignation stuck. Then I got my second shock, which was the discovery that the
doors of every bank in the United States were closed to me, and I never could again get a job, as it were, in the banks. I
found myself, for the first time since I graduated from college, out of a job. From there on I followed
various branches of the financial world, ranging from investment counsel to membership of the stock exchange and finally ended
as an adviser to a few individuals who had capital funds to look after. In the meantime, my major interest became very specific,
which was to endeavor by some means of getting the educational world to actually you might say teach the subject of economics
realistically and move it away from the support of various speculative activities that characterize our country. I have had
that interest, and you know how, as you generate a specific interest, you find yourself gravitating toward persons with similar
interests, and ultimately I found myself in the center of the world of dissatisfaction with the directions that this country
was headed. I found myself in contact with many individuals who on their own had done a vast amount of studying and research
in areas, which were part of the problem.
ED GRIFFIN: At what point in your career did you become connected with the Reece Committee?
NORMAN DODD: 1953.
ED GRIFFIN: And what was that capacity, sir?
NORMAN DODD: That was in the capacity of what they called Director
Can you tell us what the Reece Committee was attempting to do?
NORMAN DODD: Yes, I can tell you. It was operating and carrying out instructions embodied in a resolution
passed by the House of Representatives, which was to investigate the activities of foundations as to whether or not these
activities could justifiably be labeled un-American without, I might say, defining what they meant by "un-American".
That was the resolution, and the committee had then the task of selecting a counsel, and the counsel in turn had the task
of selecting a staff, and he had to have somebody who would direct the work of that staff, and that was what they meant by
the Director of Research.
What were some of the details, the specifics that you told the Committee at that time?
NORMAN DODD: Well, Mr. Griffin, in that report I specifically,
number one, defined what, to us, was meant by the phrase, "un-American." We defined that in our way as being a determination
to effect changes in the country by unconstitutional means. We have plenty of constitutional procedures, assuming we wish
to effect a change in the form of government and that sort of thing; and, therefore, any effort in that direction which did
not avail itself of the procedures which were authorized by the Constitution could be justifiably be called un-American. That
was the start of educating them up to that particular point. The next thing was to educate them as to the effect on the country
as a whole of the activities of large, endowed foundations over the then-past forty years.
ED GRIFFIN: What was that effect?
NORMAN DODD: That effect was to orient our educational system
away from support of the principles embodied in the Declaration of Independence and implemented in the Constitution; and the
task now was the orientation of education away from these briefly stated principles and self-evident truths. That's what had
been the effect of the wealth, which constituted the endowments of those foundations that had been in existence over the largest
portion of this span of 50 years, and holding them responsible for this change. What we were able to bring forward, what we
uncovered, was the determination of these large endowed foundations, through their trustees, to actually get control over
the content of American education.
ED GRIFFIN: There's quite a bit of publicity given to your conversation with Rowan Gaither. Would you
please tell us who he was and what was that conversation you had with him?
NORMAN DODD: Rowan Gaither was, at that time, president of the Ford Foundation. Mr. Gaither had sent
for me when I found it convenient to be in New York, asked me to call upon him at his office, which I did. Upon arrival, after
a few amenities, Mr. Gaither said: “Mr. Dodd, we've asked you to come up here today because we thought that possibly,
off the record, you would tell us why the Congress is interested in the activities of foundations such as ourselves?”
Before I could think of how I would reply to that statement, Mr. Gaither then went on voluntarily and said:
“Mr. Dodd, all of us who have a hand in the making of policies here have had experience
either with the OSS during the war or the European Economic Administration after the war. We've had experience operating under
directives, and these directives emanate and did emanate from the White House. Now, we still operate under just such directives.
Would you like to know what the substance of these directives is?” I said, “Mr. Gaither, I’d
like very much to know,” whereupon he made this statement to me: “Mr. Dodd, we are here operate in response to
similar directives, the substance of which is that we shall use our grant-making power so to alter life in the United States
that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.” Well, parenthetically, Mr. Griffin, I nearly
fell off the chair. I, of course didn't, but my response to Mr. Gaither then was: “Well, Mr. Gaither I can now answer
your first question. You've forced the Congress of the United States to spend $150,000 to find out what you've just told me.”
I said: “Of course, legally, you're entitled to make grants for this purpose, but I don't think you're entitled to withhold
that information from the people of the country to whom you're indebted for your tax exemption, so why don't you tell the
people of the country what you just told me?” And his answer was, “We would not think of doing any such thing.”
So then I said, “Well, Mr. Gaither, obviously you've forced the Congress to spend this money in order to find out what
you've just told me.” ED GRIFFIN: Mr. Dodd, you have spoken before about some interesting
things that were discovered by Katherine Casey at the Carnegie Endowment. Can you tell us that story, please?
NORMAN DODD: Yes, I’d be glad to, Mr. Griffin. This experience
that you just referred to came about in response to a letter that I had written to the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace, asking certain questions and gathering certain information. On the arrival of that letter, Dr. Johnson, who was then
president of the Carnegie Endowment, telephoned me and said, did I ever come up to New York. I said yes, I did more or less
each weekend, and he said, “Well, when you're next here, will you drop in and see us?” Which I did.
On arrival at the office of the endowment I found myself in the presence of Dr. Joseph Johnson, the president – who
was the successor to Alger Hiss – two vice presidents, and their own counsel, a partner in the firm of Sullivan and
Cromwell. Dr. Johnson said, after again amenities, Mr. Dodd, we have your letter. We can answer all those questions, but it
would be a great deal of trouble, and we have a counter suggestion. Our counter suggestion is: If you can spare a member of
your staff for two weeks and send that member up to New York, we will give to that member a room in the library and the minute
books of this foundation since its inception, and we think that whatever you want to find out or that Congress wants to find
out will be obvious from those minutes. Well, my first reaction was they'd lost their minds. I had a pretty
good idea of what those minutes would contain, but I realized that Dr. Johnson had only been in office two years, and the
other vice presidents were relatively young men, and counsel seemed to be also a young man, and I guessed that probably they'd
never read the minutes themselves. So I said I had somebody; I would accept their offer. I went back
to Washington and I selected a member of my staff who had been a practicing attorney in Washington. She was on my staff to
see to it that I didn't break any congressional procedures or rules, in addition to which she was unsympathetic to the purpose
of the investigation. She was level-headed and a very reasonably brilliant, capable lady. Her attitude toward the investigation
was: What could possibly be wrong with foundations? They do so much good. Well, in the face of that
sincere conviction of Katherine's I went out of my way not to prejudice her in any way, but I did explain to her that she
couldn't possibly cover 50 years of written minutes in two weeks, so she would have to do what we call spot reading. I blocked
out certain periods of time to concentrate on, and off she went to New York. She came back at the end of two weeks with the
following on dictaphone tapes:
We are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations. In that year, the trustees,
meeting for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year in a very
learned fashion. The question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the
life of an entire people?” And they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is known to humanity. So then, in 1909, they raised the second question and discussed it, namely: “How do we involve the United States
in a war?” Well, I doubt at that time if there was any subject more removed from the thinking of most
of the people of this country than its involvement in a war. There were intermittent shows in the Balkans, but I doubt very
much if many people even knew where the Balkans were. Then, finally, they answered that question as follows: “We must
control the State Department.” That very naturally raises the question of how do we do that? And they answer it by saying:
“We must take over and control the diplomatic machinery of this country.” And, finally, they resolve to aim at
that as an objective. Then time passes, and we are eventually in a war, which would be World War I. At that
time they record on their minutes a shocking report in which they dispatched to President Wilson a telegram, cautioning him
to see that the war does not end too quickly. Finally, of course, the war is over. At that time their interest
shifts over to preventing what they call a reversion of life in the United States to what it was prior to 1914 when World
War I broke out. At that point they came to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, “we must control education
in the United States.” They realize that that's a pretty big task. It is too big for them alone, so they approach the
Rockefeller Foundation with the suggestion that that portion of education which could be considered domestic be handled by
the Rockefeller Foundation and that portion which is international should be handled by the Endowment. They then decide that
the key to success of these two operations lay in the alteration of the teaching of American history. So
they approach four of the then-most prominent teachers of American history in the country – people like Charles and
Mary Byrd – and their suggestion to them is: will they alter the manner in which they present their subject? And they
got turned down flat. So they then decide that it is necessary for them to do as they say, “build our own stable of
historians.” Then they approach the Guggenheim Foundation, which specializes in fellowships,
and say: “When we find young men in the process of studying for doctorates in the field of American history and we feel
that they are the right caliber, will you grant them fellowships on our say-so?” And the answer is yes. So, under that
condition, eventually they assembled assemble twenty, and they take this twenty potential teachers of American history to
London, and there they're briefed on what is expected of them when, as, and if they secure appointments in keeping with the
doctorates they will have earned. That group of twenty historians ultimately becomes the nucleus of the American Historical
Association. Toward the end of the 1920's, the Endowment grants to the American Historical Association $400,000
for a study of our history in a manner which points to what can this country look forward to in the future. That culminates
in a seven-volume study, the last volume of which is, of course, in essence a summary of the contents of the other six. The
essence of the last volume is: The future of this country belongs to collectivism administered with characteristic American
efficiency. That's the story that ultimately grew out of and, of course, was what could have been presented by the members
of this Congressional committee to the congress as a whole for just exactly what it said. They never got to that point.
ED GRIFFIN: This is the story that emerged from the minutes
of the Carnegie Endowment?
NORMAN DODD: That's right. It was official to that extent.
ED GRIFFIN: Katherine Casey brought all of these back in the
form of dictated notes from a verbatimreading of the minutes?
NORMAN DODD: On dictaphone belts.
ED GRIFFIN: Are those in existence today?
NORMAN DODD: I don't know. If they are, they're somewhere in the Archives under the control of the
Congress, House of Representatives.
ED GRIFFIN: How many people actually heard those, or were they typed up, a transcript made of them?
How many people actually heard those recordings?
NORMAN DODD: Oh, three maybe. Myself, my top assistant, and Katherine. I might tell you, this experience,
as far as its impact on Katherine Casey was concerned, was she never was able to return to her law practice. If it hadn't
been for Carol Reece's ability to tuck her away into a job in the Federal Trade Commission, I don't know what would have happened
to Katherine. Ultimately, she lost her mind as a result of it. It was a terrible shock. It's a very rough experience to encounter
proof of these kinds.
Mr. Dodd can you summarize the opposition to the Committee, the Reece Committee and particularly the efforts to sabotaging
DODD: Well, they began right at the start of the work of an operating staff, Mr. Griffin, and it began on the day in
which the Committee met for the purpose of consenting to or confirming my appointment to the position of Director of Research.
Thanks to the abstention of the minority members of the committee, that is, the two Democratic members, from voting, technically
I was unanimously appointed.
Wasn't the White House involved in opposition?
NORMAN DODD: Not at this particular point, sir. Mr. Reece ordered counsel and myself to visit Wayne
Hayes. Wayne Hayes was the ranking minority member of the Committee as a Democrat, so we came to him, and I had to go down
to Mr. Hayes's office, which I did. Mr. Hayes greeted us with the flat statement directed primarily to me, which was that
“I am opposed to this investigation. I regard it as nothing but an effort on the part of Carol Reece to gain a little
prominence, so I'll do everything I can to see that it fails.” Well, I have a strange personality in that a challenge
of that nature interests me. Our counsel withdrew. He went over and sat on the couch in Mr. Reece's office and pouted, but
I sort of took up this statement of Hayes as a challenge and set myself the goal of winning him over to our point of view.
I started by noticing on his desk that there was a book, and the book was of the type that – there were many in these
days – that would be complaining about the spread of Communism in Hungary, that type of book. This meant to me at least
he has read a book, and so I brought up the subject of the spread of the influence of the Soviet world. For two hours, I discussed
this with Hayes and finally ended up with his rising from his desk and saying: “Norm, if you will carry this investigation
toward the goal as you have outlined to me, I'll be your biggest supporter.” I said: “Mr. Hayes, I can assure
you that I will not double-cross you.” Subsequently Mr. Hayes sent word to me that he was in Bethesda
Hospital with an attack of ulcers, but would I come and see him, which I did. He then said: “Norm, the only reason I’ve
asked you to come out here is I just want to hear you say again you will not double-cross me.” I gave him that assurance,
and that was the basis of our relationship. Meantime, counsel took the attitude expressed in these words: “Norm, if
you want to waste your time with this guy,” as he called him, “you go ahead and do it, but don't ever ask me to
say anything to him under any conditions on any subject.” So, in a sense, that created a context for me to operate in
relation to Hayes on my own. As time passed, Hayes offered friendship, which I hesitated to accept because of his vulgarity,
and I didn't want to get mixed up with him socially under any conditions. Well, that was our relationship
for about three months, and then, eventually, I had occasion to add to my staff a top-flight intelligence officer. Both the
Republican National Committee and the White House were resorted to, to stop me from continuing this investigation in the directions
Carol Reece had personally asked me to do, which was to utilize this investigation, Mr. Griffin, to uncover the fact that
this country had been the victim of a conspiracy. That was Mr. Reece's conviction. I eventually agreed to carry it out. I
explained to Mr. Reece that Hayes's own counsel wouldn't go in that direction. He gave me permission to disregard their counsel,
and I had then to set up an aspect of the investigation outside of our office, more or less secret. The Republican National
Committee got wind of what I was doing and they did everything they could to stop me. They appealed to counsel to stop me,
and finally they resorted to the White House.
ED GRIFFIN: Was their objection because of what you were doing or because of the fact that you were
doing it outside of the official auspices of the Committee?
NORMAN DODD: No, their objection was, as they put it, my devotion to what they called anti-semitism.
That was a cooked up idea. In other words, it wasn't true at all, but anyway, that's the way they expressed it.
ED GRIFFIN: Why did they do that? How could they say that?
NORMAN DODD: Well, they could say it, Mr. Griffin, but they
had to have something in the way of a rationalization of their decision to do everything they could to stop the completion
of this investigation in the directions that it was moving, which would have been an exposure of this Carnegie Endowment story
and the Ford Foundation and the Guggenheim and the Rockefeller Foundation, all working in harmony toward the control of education
in the United States. Well, to secure the help of the White House in the picture, they got the White House to cause the liaison
personality between the White House and the hill, a Major Person, to go up to Hayes and try to get him to, as it were, actively
oppose what the investigation was engaged in. Hayes very kindly then would listen to this visit from Major Person; then he
would call me and say, “Norm, come up to my office. I have a good deal to tell you.” I would go up. He would tell
me, “I’ve just had a visit from Major Person, and he wants me to break up this investigation.” I then said,
“Well, what did you do? What did you say to him?” He said,” I just told him to get the hell out.”
He did that three times, and I got pretty proud of him in the sense that he was, as it were, backing me up. We finally embarked
upon the hearing at Hayes's request, because he wanted to get them out of the way before he went abroad for the summer.
ED GRIFFIN: Why were the hearings finally terminated? What happened
to the Committee?
DODD: What happened to the Committee or the hearings?
ED GRIFFIN: The hearings.
NORMAN DODD: Oh, the hearings were terminated. Carol Reece was up against such a furor with Hayes through
the activity of our own counsel. Hayes became convinced that he was being double-crossed and he put on a show in a public
hearing room, Mr. Griffin, that was an absolute disgrace. He called Carol Reece publicly every name in the book, and Mr. Reece
took this as proof that he couldn't continue the hearings. He actually invited me to accompany him when he went down to Hayes's
office and, in my presence with tears rolling down his face, Hayes apologized to Carol Reece for what he had done and his
conduct, and apologized to me. I thought that would be enough and that Carol would resume, but he never did.
ED GRIFFIN: The charge of anti-semitism is intriguing. What
was the basis of that charge? Was there a basis for it at all?
NORMAN DODD: The basis of what the Republican National Committee used was that the intelligence officer
I’d taken on my staff when I oriented this investigation to the exposure and proof of a conspiracy was known to have
a book, and the book was deemed to be anti-semitic. This was childish, but this was the second in command of the Republican
National Committee, and he told me I’d have to dismiss this person from my staff.
ED GRIFFIN: Who was that person?
NORMAN DODD: A Colonel Lee Lelane.
ED GRIFFIN: And what was his book? Do you recall?
NORMAN DODD: The book they referred to was called Waters Flowing
Eastward, which was a castigation of the Jewish influence in the world.
ED GRIFFIN: What were some of the other charges made by Mr. Hayes against Mr. Reece?
NORMAN DODD: Just that Mr. Reece was utilizing this investigation
for his own prominence inside the House of Representatives. That was the only charge that Hayes could think of.
ED GRIFFIN: How would you describe the motivation of the people
who created the foundations, the big foundations, in the very beginning? What was their motivation?
NORMAN DODD: Their motivation? Well, let's take Mr. Carnegie
as an example. He has publicly declared that his steadfast interest was to counteract the departure of the colonies from Great
Britain. He was devoted to just putting the pieces back together again.
ED GRIFFIN: Would that have required the collectivism that they were dedicated to?
NORMAN DODD: No, no, no. These policies, the foundations’
allegiance to these un-American concepts, are all traceable to the transfer of the funds into the hands of trustees, Mr. Griffin.
It's not the men who had a hand in the creation of the wealth that led to the endowment for what we would call public purposes.
ED GRIFFIN: It's a subversion of the original intent, then?
NORMAN DODD: Oh, yes, completely, and that’s how it got
into the world traditionally of bankers and lawyers.
ED GRIFFIN: How do you see that the purpose and direction of the major foundations has changed over
the years to the present? What is it today?
NORMAN DODD: Oh, it’s a hundred percent behind meeting the cost of education such as it is presented
through the schools and colleges of the United States on the subject of our history as proving our original ideas to be no
longer practicable. The future belongs to collectivistic concepts, and there's just no disagreement on that.
ED GRIFFIN: Why do the foundations generously support Communist
causes in the United States?
DODD: Well, because to them, Communism represents a means of developing what we call a monopoly, that is, an organization
of, say, a large-scale industry into an administerable unit.
ED GRIFFIN: Do they think that they will be the ones to benefit?
NORMAN DODD: They will be the beneficiaries of it, yes.
~ The Hidden Symbolism Within “THE
WIZARD of OZ” ~ Written by
L. Frank Baum, -- It's Much More -- Than a Mere Child's Story. There's Actually A Real
Story ... Behind The Story.
What is "Oz" a symbol for? Ounces.
What is measured in ounces? Gold.
What is the yellow brick road? Bricks or ingot bars of gold.
The character known as the 'Straw Man' represents that fictitious,
ALL CAPS, legal fiction - a PERSON, the Federal U.S.Government created with the same spelling as your birth name.
Remember what the Straw Man wanted from the
Wizard of Oz? A Brain, Remember?!
juristic person - legal fiction - paper corporation has a brain because he/she has no breath of life.
What did he get in place of a brain?
A certificate: a 'Birth Certificate' for
a new legal creation.
was proud of his new legal status, plus all the other legalisms he was granted ... Now he becomes the epitome of the brainless
sack of straw who was given a certificate in place of a grain of common sense.
Now, what about the Tin Man? Does Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) recall
anything to mind? The poor TIN Man just stood there mindlessly doing his work, until his body literally froze up and stopped
himself to death, because he had no heart nor soul.
He's the heartless and emotionless creature, robotically carrying out his daily task, as
though he were already dead. He's the ox pulling the plow and the mule toiling under the yoke.
These days, his task masters just oil him nightly with beer
and place him in front of a hypnotic television, until his very existence no longer has any meaning or value.
His masters keep him cold on the outside
and heartless on the inside in order to control any emotion or feeling that might arise.
The Cowardly Lion was always too frightened to stand up for
himself. Of course, he was a bully and a big mouth when it came to picking on those smaller than he. (Have you ever noticiced
how bullies are really the biggest cowards? They act as though they have great courage, but, in reality, have none at all.
They roar, but with no teeth of authority to back them up.)
When push came to shove, the Cowardly Lion always buckled under and whimpered when anyone
of any size or stature challenged him.
wanted courage from the Grand Wizard, so he was awarded a medal of "official" recognition. Now, although remaining
a coward, his official status allowed him to be a bully, but with officially recognized authority. (He's not unlike the Attorneys
who hide behind the Middle Courts of the Temple Bar.) et al ad infinitum.
What about the trip through the field of poppies? Did you notice how this
had no narcotic effect on the Straw Man (no brain) or the Tin Man (no heart or soul)?
They weren't real people, so drugs could not influence them.
The Wizard of Oz was written at the turn
of the century, so how could the author have known America was going to be drugged?
The Crown has been playing the drug cartel game for centuries.
was the Emerald City? The Federal Reserve System.
finally exposed the Wizard for what he really was?
the ugly (or cute, depending on your perspective) and somewhat annoying little dog. Toto means "in total, all together;
Latin in toto."
What was it that
the witch wanted after she alleged that the little dog had bitten her?
TOTO, meaning ... EVERYTHING.
Notice how Toto was not scared of the Great Wizard's theatrics, yet he was so small in size, compared to
the Wizard, that no one seemed to notice him?
smoke, flames and holographic images of Oz were designed to frighten people into doing as the Great Wizard commanded.
Toto simply padded over, looked behind the curtain (the COURT,
etc.), saw it was a scam, started barking until others paid attention to him and came to see what all the barking was about.
Who was behind the curtain?
ORDINARY PERSON controlling the levers that created the illusion of the Great Wizard's power and authority.
When Toto pulled back the curtain and completely exposed
him, the charade was at an end. (The veil hiding the corporate legal fiction and its false courts was removed.)
The Wizard's game was UP. What was he after all? ... a con-man.
We can see, in this tale,
just how loud the bark from a little dog can be.
about YOUR bark? How big is it?
of us remain silent and wait to be given whatever food and recognition, if any, by our legal master.
Let us not forget those pesky flying monkeys. What perfect
mythical creatures to represent the Bar Association Attorneys who attack and control the little people for the Great Crown
Wizard, the powerful and grand Bankers of Oz: GOLD!
How, finally, was the evil witch destroyed? .... pure, clean water LIQUIDATION!
How, at last, did Dorothy get home? She simply clicked her heels.
She always had the power, and SO DO WE!
What would it take to expose the Wizard for what he is, tearing
away his veils?
We each need only a
brain, a heart and soul --- and COURAGE.
and perhaps of the greatest importance, we need to learn HOW to WORK TOGETHER.
Only "in TOTO," WORKING TOGETHER as ONE Body
of the King of Kings, (whatever name or form that may take for each of us), can we have the freedom given under God's
Your OWN (Hi-resolution) Copy, of “The Secret of OZ” DVD
“America: Freedom to Fascism”
“Reflections And Warnings” (An Interview With Film Director & Insider, Aaron Russo)
“Eye Of The Phoenix: Secrets
Of The Dollar Bill”
The Bankers Manifesto of 1892: (History Repeated) Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. revealed the Bankers Manifesto of 1892
to the U.S.
Congress somewhere between 1907 and 1917.
We (the bankers) must proceed with caution and guard every move
made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy
of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without
fear of any organized resistance.
in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations
in our interest or disrupt them.
the coming Omaha convention to be held July 4, 1892, our men must attend and direct its movement or else there will be set
on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome.
This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such
a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination (conspiracy) and legislation.
The courts must be called to our aid, debts
must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.
When, through the process of law, the common people have lost their homes,
they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central
power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers.
People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. History repeats
itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the
world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.
The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization
known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican
By thus dividing
voters, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to
the common herd. Thus, by discrete actions, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished.
“The Money Masters” “The
Creature From Jekyll Island”
BANKSTER CONFESSES AT 100
YEAR JEKYLL ISLAND ANNIVERSARY!
Former 'FED' Chairman Alan Greenspan, Admits To Rampant FRAUD
& Illegal Activity In U.S. Banking System, While On Jekyll Island Stage With Currant 'FED' Chairman, Ben Bernanke,
(From The 'Federal' Reserve's 100 Year Anniversary Celebration of the Overthrow
of The U.S. at Jekyll Island). Bernanke looks uncomfortable as Greenspan admits the truth.
This is exactly what the Founding Fathers wanted to avoid; A centralised cartel of 'Bankster criminals' looting our country's coffers, while affecting
the rights of Sovereign States along with its people. Hence, the Jeffersonian struggle of the Confederate? South against Washington
D.C.'s 'proto-Empire' of the time, which only a central bank can make possible. The Rest, (as they say) Is History...
(An 'In Depth' Study, On How
The “Banksters” Have Been RIPPINGUSOFF!)
Morgan Stanley Bankster - Hits Pedestrian, Then Drives Off - NOT
Charged W/Felony! It
Seems As Though SOME People ARE More 'Equal' Than Others ... Morgan Stanley banker
escapes felony charges for hit and run, “because it could jeopardize his job ...” A financial manager for
wealthy clients will not face charges for a hit-and-run, because it could jeopardize his job, it's been revealed. Martin Joel
Erzinger, 52, was set to face felony charges for running over a doctor, who he hit from behind in his 2010 Mercedes Benz,
then sped off. But now, he'll simply face two misdemeanor traffic charges from
the July 3 incident in Eagle, Colorado. (What Do You
Think Would Happen, If YOU Did That?!)
The BANK$ER$ Gorged, On A Record $144 BILLION
Dollars In X-mas Bonuses In 2010 -- And No One Bothered To Notice ...
Now ... For Some NEW$
“The United States Must Stop Resisting The Orderly
Decline of The Dollar, The Coming Global Currency And The New World Order”
“Money As Debt” (47 Min)
“The problems the “FED” originally created to solve,
now look miniscule,
compared to the problems it’s created.”
“The solution is, to return sanity and economic freedom to monetary
policy ... Forcing the entire country, to use a medium of exchange, that is subject to the whims of elite bankers
and their cronies on Wall Street, is NOT sanity ... Hoping that an unchecked, all-powerful, behemoth banking cartel,
will solve any economic problem, is NOT sanity.” ~ (R-TX.) Congressman Ron Paul
“Let It NotEver Be Said,
No One Cared ... That We Did Nothing.” ~ True American Statesman, Texas Republican Congressman,
Ron Paul ~
“The division of the United States into two federations of equal force was decided long before
the civil war by the high financial power of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained in
one block and as one nation, would attain economical and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination
over the world. The voice of the Rothschilds predominated. They foresaw the tremendous booty if they could substitute two
feeble democracies, indebted to the financiers, to the vigorous Republic, confident and self-providing. Therefore they started
their emissaries in order to exploit the question of slavery and thus dig an abyss between the two parts of the Republic.”
~ Otto Von Bismarck, 1876 ~
records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to
maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” ~ President James Madison - 4th President of The United States
“The inability of the colonists to get power to
issue their own money permanently out of the hands of George III and the international bankers, was the PRIME reason
for the Revolutionary War.”
“In The Beginning of a Change, The Patriot Is a Scarce Man ... Brave, Hated and Scorned. But When
His Cause Succeeds, The Timid Join Him. For Then ... It Costs Nothing To Be a Patriot.” ~ Mark Twain ~
“It is natural to man, to indulge in the illusions of hope ... We are apt to shut our eyes against
a painful truth and listen to the song of that siren, till she transforms us into beasts. ... For my part, whatever
anguish of spirit it might cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry ~
Take Care Website Visitor, Please
Keep In Touch & May God Help America. Know That Reality Is, (Indeed) Stranger, Than Fiction ...
“Intelligence Is Treason, In a Country
Full of Idiots”
“When a government is dependent upon
bankers for money,
and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives, is above the hand that takes …
Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency ... their sole object is gain.”
~ Napoleon Bonaparte, 1815 ~
Thanks For Stoppin' In ... Please
Forward This Webpage On To Others.